The current government is in the middle of cabinet
reshuffle, even though it started several months ago claiming “right person for
the right place.” Seeing the departure of several incompetent ministers, Japanese
now realize that the ruling party is in short of excellent human resources. Absorbed
too much in factionalism, current leaders seem to have missed the duty of
developing human resources. Shigeru Yoshida, unquestionably Japan’s greatest
postwar politician, left such excellent leaders as Nobusuke Kishi, Eisaku Sato,
and Hayato Ikeda. Developing human resources is a toilsome and time-consuming
job, but it is one of the most important duties that a leader has to perform.
Several months ago, it was clarified that the president of a leading paper mill
company had donated as much as 10 billion (not million) yen to gambling establishments
in Macau in secret for nothing. He is a grandson of the founder of this
company. Shinpei Goto, a great politician from the late 19th century to the
early 20th century, gave an excellent lesson to his successors. He said, “Leaving
money is the worst, leaving a company is in the middle, and leaving human
resources is the best.”
Interesting and exciting stories from Japanese business and political scenes
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
No. 13: Ongoing and endless discussions on nuclear power generation (December 29, 2011)
In Japan, there are still ongoing and
endless discussions on what Japan should do with nuclear power generation. As a
matter of fact, Japanese are very fond of discussing an issue that does not
have a correct answer. The discussions always end with no consensus, and the
only agreement is that lots of more discussions are necessary to find the right
solution of the issue. The opponents resort to sentimental argument, while the
supporters emphasize the safety and reliability of the technology. It is
totally out of the question to focus on sentimental argument in this issue. Doubtlessly,
Japanese and people on the earth alike sympathize with the victims of the disaster
on March 11, 2011 with no exceptions. However, the fact remains that we cannot
go back to the past. The more affluent a society grows, the more energy it
needs. It is very simple and clear. A diet member told, “We should ask all the
Japanese people on what Japan should do with nuclear generation.” National
ballot? What can we learn from the national ballot? A national ballot will create
another endless discussion on a nationwide scale. Diet members are representing
the opinions of Japanese to avoid endless discussions of this kind, aren’t they?
Monday, December 5, 2011
No. 12: Yes or No? The answer is between the two (December 6, 2011)
The Japanese government is still
unsuccessful in formulating decisive and effective policies on how to get
involved in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). All diet members and Japanese
alike share the same opinion that it is necessary to make the domestic
agriculture industry stronger. Nonetheless, diet members fail to reach an
agreement on Japan’s direction toward the TPP. The turmoil can be attributed to
the declaration of Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda.
He declared, “The Japanese government will
start negotiations with the countries involved to start discussions toward the
participation in the TPP.” This rather unintelligible declaration caused the
current stalemate. The Japanese government does not take his declaration as an
official decision to participate in the TPP. What on the earth is his attitude,
yes or no? The answer is between the two. As is often the case, no breakthrough
can be found for this stalemate. A strange equilibrium exits between the
supporters and opponents.
Because necessary measures and policies
depend on future progress, both parties are very cautious about taking concrete
actions. However, the Japanese government should not forget that it formulated
only follow-up measures in the Uruguay Round (1986-1993) under the slogan “Do
not allow foreign rice to come to the Japanese market” and wasted a 6 billion
yen budget. The present Japan’s top leader does not seem to take a risk, as is
often the case of a leader with excellent academic records. It should be noted
that excellent academic records are merely one of the prerequisites to be a top
leader.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
No. 11: Once upon a time in Japan (December 4, 2011)
Роsatom,
Russia’s government managed nuclear company,
will come to Japan with its nuclear technology. Under the initiative of Prime
Minister Putin, the state company wishes to establish business relations with
Japanese leading companies in the nuclear business and plans to participate in
the operations in the devastated Fukushima nuclear power plant. Once upon a
time, we Japanese had an easygoing prime minister claiming proudly that Japan
should abandon nuclear power generation and focus only on renewable energy.
Time passes very fast. While Japan had barren and wasteful discussions on what
Japan should do with nuclear generation, other countries are developing nuclear
technology very fast. It is necessary to make strenuous efforts for one year to
make up for a loss of half a year created by negligence.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
No. 10: Do not try to be a John Wayne (November 20, 2011)
The current headline
news in the Japanese baseball world is not a battle between baseball teams on
the ground but an internal battle between owner and manager of a baseball team
in the office over the team’s future lineup. In the sports business, you can
find this kind of battle quite easily. George Steinbrenner of New York Yankees
may be the most famous figure. The Japanese manager in question seems to be too
proud to succumb to the owner and try to be a hero. Most Japanese understand
the manager and have some uncomfortable feeling about the attitude taken by the
owner. But that is the way the world goes. “Rio Bravo”starring John Wayne is a
movie. The reality is what you see in “High Noon” starring Gary Cooper. Do not
try to be a John Wayne. The manager had better keep in mind what Gary Cooper said in the movie. He said, “It’s crazy!”
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
No. 9: Who is the real winner in the long run? (November 3, 2011)
The price of a
residential photovoltaic generation system has been decreasing in Japan because
of the inflow of low-priced products from Europe and China. The industry
sources are much concerned about the decreasing profit of domestic makers. They
say that the average price of a system dropped to 529,000 yen per kW lately, an
8.5% decrease from the previous year. Because a solar battery module accounts
for 50% of a photovoltaic generation system in cost, countries capable of
building solar modules cheap naturally have a strong competitive edge. However,
you need to think about the background of the inflow of foreign products.
European countries including Germany reduced the support for the introduction
of a photovoltaic generation system. Actually, the world market is estimated to
decrease 20% in 2011 from 2010. Then, Japan is a rather promising market
because it will enact the system to buy whole amount of renewable energy next
year. In a word, the policy to enhance the happiness of Japanese people ends up
with the decreasing profit of Japanese makers and makes the domestic economy
even worse. What an irony this is.
Friday, October 28, 2011
No. 8: Look west! Times have changed (October 28, 2011)
Look West! This is the phrase that Japan
has to keep in mind to activate its economy. Under the strong and impressive
leadership of the incumbent president, Korea is increasing its presence in the world market quite rapidly. In contrast, Japan is losing its presence as we see
from the TV business. Neither Panasonic nor Sony is the biggest TV set
manufacturer in the world market. The world leaders are Samsung and LG
Electronics of Korea. Under any circumstances, Japan should not hesitate to
participate in TPP. Look East! This is the phrase that Mahathir
bin Mohamad, Malaysia’s fourth prime minister, used to stimulate the economy of
his country. Times have changed. Now the time Japan has to look west. There is no room to place too much importance on consensus. It is
totally impossible to work out measures equally acceptable to all people
concerned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)